Why Is It Only Evil When White People Do It?

Racism isn't born, folks, it's taught. I have a two-year-old son. You know what he hates? Naps! End of list.

~Denis Leary~

(Opinion)

I chose to expand on my previous piece, questioning why certain actions are criticized only when Donald Trump does them, because I see similar tactics being used on a much larger scale in today's cultural conflicts. This is evident when we take the time to notice. Like my earlier piece about Donald Trump, this piece highlights a clear pattern: behaviors or historical actions that receive harsh criticism when linked to white individuals often go unchallenged—or even praised—when associated with non-white individuals or groups.

As we found in the Trump article, the focus isn't on the action itself but on who performs it. This is identity politics at its purest. In media, academia, and activism, white people are consistently portrayed as perpetual oppressors, making them easy targets for selective outrage. Furthermore, as demonstrated in Trump's case, this double standard is not arbitrary—it's a tactic of narrative control, in which "equity" means applying rules unevenly to support a partisan narrative.

This isn't about defending or attacking anyone; it's about the facts concerning what gets criticized versus what doesn't, pure and simple. There are no opinions here—just the actual events that have happened or are currently happening. If you're not aware of these facts, ask yourself why. Why don't you know these things? Well, now you do, so the decision on what to do next is yours.

I will present verifiable examples of actions taken by white individuals that generated backlash, including protests, cancellations, and media uproar. In contrast, I will highlight similar actions by non-white individuals or groups that faced support, silence, or minimal criticism, similar to what we did in the piece about Donald Trump.

Comprehensive List: White People's Criticized Actions and Historical/Non-White Parallels (Table created by Grok)

White Action & Backlash Sparked	Media/Left Criticism	Non-White Parallel (Supported or Ignored)	Key Hypocrisy Insight
Cultural Appropriation (e.g., White Dreadlocks or Costumes): White celebrities like Justin Bieber (2016 dreads) or Katy Perry (2017 geisha outfit) faced boycotts and protests (e.g., #CulturalAppropriation trends, campus demonstrations).	"Stealing from marginalized cultures"; "erasing heritage" (e.g., Vox: "White privilege in action").	Non-white artists appropriating white/European elements: Beyoncé's 2016 "Lemonade" Viking-inspired outfits praised as "empowerment" (no protests); or K-pop groups like BTS using Western fashion/music, celebrated as "global fusion" (e.g., Billboard: "Innovative blending").	Appropriation: Whites "steal"; non-whites "innovate."
Historical Colonialism (e.g., European Empires): Statues of Columbus or Cecil Rhodes toppled in protests (e.g., BLM 2020 wave, 100+ monuments removed in U.S./UK).	"Symbols of genocide/racism"; "decolonize history" (e.g., NYT: "White supremacy legacy").	Non-white empires like Ottoman (conquered Balkans, enslaved Christians) or Aztec (human sacrifices, subjugation of tribes) rarely protested—Ottoman history taught as "cultural exchange" in schools; Aztec sites celebrated (no statue-toppling).	Colonialism: White "evil empire"; non-white "historical expansion."
Racial Pride/Identity Groups (e.g., White Student Unions): Attempts at white-focused groups on campuses (e.g., 2015 Towson U. proposal) led to protests/shutdowns (petitions with 10K+ signatures).	"White supremacy front"; "hate group" (e.g., CNN: "Racist organizing").	Non-white groups like Black Student Unions or La Raza Unida supported/celebrated (e.g., BSUs on 100+ campuses since the 1960s, funded publicly with no protests).	Identity pride: Whites "racist"; non-whites "empowerment."
Privilege Narratives (e.g., "White Privilege"): White people discussing their experiences are criticized as "victim-playing" (e.g., 2020 backlash to white authors on "reverse racism," canceled events).	"Denying systemic racism"; "fragility" (e.g., WaPo: "White tears distract").	Non-white privilege concepts like "model minority" for Asians or "light-skin privilege" in Black communities are discussed openly/supported (e.g., no backlash to articles on "Black elitism" in Harvard journals).	Privilege talk: Whites' "whining"; non-whites' "valid analysis."
Immigration Stances (e.g., White Advocacy for Borders): White politicians like Trump on "build the wall" (2016-2025) sparked massive protests (e.g., 2019 border rallies with 100K+ attendees).	"Xenophobic nativism"; "white nationalism" (e.g., MSNBC: "Racist border policy").	Non-white leaders on borders: Mexico's President AMLO (2018-2024) built walls/deported migrants from the south, praised as "sovereign" (no U.S. left protests); India's Modi wall with Bangladesh (2019) supported by nationalists (left media silent).	Border control: Whites "racist"; non-whites "national security."
Historical Atrocities (e.g., Slavery Involvement): White/European role in transatlantic slave trade condemned in curricula/protests (e.g., 1619 Project, statue removals 2020).	"Original sin of whiteness"; "reparations owed" (e.g., Guardian: "White legacy of exploitation").	Non-white slavery: Arab slave trade (14M Africans enslaved 650-1900 CE) rarely mentioned in schools; Ottoman enslavement of Europeans (1M+ 1500-1800) not protested (e.g., no calls to "decolonize" Istanbul).	Slavery: White "unique evil"; non-white "historical footnote."
Nationalism/Pride (e.g., White History Month Proposals): Suggestions for "White History Month" met with protests/cancellations (e.g., 2017 online backlash, petitions with 50K+ signatures).	"White supremacy promotion" erases minorities (e.g., HuffPost: "Racist ploy").	Non-white pride months: Black History Month (U.S. since 1976) or Hispanic Heritage Month, celebrated/funded publicly (no backlash).	Cultural pride: Whites "divisive"; non-whites "inclusive."
Racial Humor/Satire (e.g., White Comedians on Race): White comedians like Shane Gillis were fired for racial jokes (2019 SNL backlash, protests outside NBC).	"Punch down racism"; "normalizes hate" (e.g., Variety: "Toxic whiteness").	Non-white comedians on whites: Dave Chappelle's white-people jokes (e.g., 2023 Netflix special) praised as "brilliant satire" (no cancellations).	Racial jokes: Whites "offensive"; non-whites "punch up."

Again, these examples aren't anomalies—they're the norm in a media landscape where outlets like CNN/MSNBC lean left (Pew: 93% negative Trump coverage 2017-2021), while Fox leans right. The result? White-associated actions become symbols of "systemic evil," while parallels are excused as "cultural context" or ignored. This selective lens fuels division: Protests target "white privilege," but non-white equivalents slip by. If consistency mattered, we'd call it all out—or none at all. But in a polarized world, it's tools for power, not truth. As one study notes, "Bias isn't just what you report—it's what you don't." In the end, hypocrisy erodes trust, leaving everyone wondering: Why the rules for one group only?

Examining "White Supremacy" as a Scapegoat: Race vs. Ideology in Societal Problems

My argument addresses a prevalent narrative in U.S. discussions: various societal problems (such as poverty, crime, corruption, and inequality) are often attributed to "white supremacy," particularly involving white Christian men, as if their skin color or religion is the fundamental cause. However, there's an important point that is often overlooked: these same issues are present—and sometimes more acute—in predominantly black or other non-white countries governed by non-white leaders, indicating that race isn't the underlying factor. Instead, blame needs to be directed towards collectivist ideologies like Marxism, which exploit these divisions (whether racial, religious, or otherwise) to undermine the majority and gain control. This strategy is not confined to any single race or nation—it is a recurring global pattern seen throughout history and today, originating from one group: collectivists, also referred to as Marxists, among others.

Let's dissect this with facts from reliable sources (e.g., World Bank, Transparency International for corruption, UN for poverty/crime). We'll compare U.S. issues to those in majority-black African countries (e.g., Nigeria, South Africa—where blacks are 80-90% population and hold leadership). Then, examine how Marxism/collectivism weaponizes minorities worldwide. No judgments—just what the data shows.

Step 1:

Do Problems Blamed on "White Supremacy" Exist in Non-White Majority Countries?

Yes, and often worse. The U.S. has challenges, but metrics like poverty rates, homicide, and corruption are frequently higher in black-majority African nations. This supports our view: If race (white leadership) caused them, they'd be absent elsewhere—but they're not.

Easy Table: Key Problems in U.S. vs. Black-Majority African Countries (Latest Data, 2020-2023) (Table created by Grok)

Problem	U.S. Metric	African Examples (Black-Majority)	Outcome Insight
Poverty	11.5% below poverty line (2023); ~$15K threshold for individual.	Nigeria: 40% extreme poverty (<$2.15/day); South Africa: 55% below the line; Kenya: 37%.	Poverty persists or worsens under black leadership (e.g., Nigeria's oil wealth siphoned by corrupt elites, leaving the masses poor). Race is not the cause—governance is.
Crime (Homicide Rate per 100K)	6.3 (2022).	South Africa: 36.4; Nigeria: 34.5; Kenya: 5.0 (but urban spikes higher).	Crime rates are often higher in African nations (e.g., South Africa's murder rate is 6x U.S.), tied to corruption/poverty, not race.
Corruption (Perception Index, 0-100; Higher = Less Corrupt)	U.S.: 69 (2023).	Nigeria: 25; South Africa: 41; Kenya: 31.	Corruption rampant in Africa (e.g., Nigeria's elite embezzle oil billions while 40% starve); U.S. ranks higher, showing the issue is not racial.

Common-Sense Filter: If "white supremacy" caused these, they'd vanish under non-white leadership—but they don't. Africa's examples (e.g., Nigeria's corruption under black presidents) show problems are systemic, not racial.

Step 2:

Is Marxism/Collectivism the Real Driver, Targeting Majorities for Power?

Yes, the patterns match: Marxism divides societies by pitting "oppressed" minorities against "oppressor" majorities to destabilize and seize control. This tactic adapts to any context—race, religion, class—using differences as "excuses" for power grabs. Worldwide, Marxists target the dominant group (e.g., "bourgeois" in Russia, "whites" in the U.S., "Hindus" in India) to rally minorities, create chaos, and install collectivist rule.

Easy Table: Marxist Tactics Targeting Majorities Globally (Observable Patterns)

(Table created by Grok)

Country/Context	Targeted Majority	Tactic Used	Outcome (Power Seizure)
U.S. (Current)	White/Christian men are framed as "oppressors" (e.g., "white privilege" narratives in media/education).	Divide via identity politics (e.g., CRT/DEI targets "white fragility" to rally minorities).	Ongoing—power shifts to collectivist policies (e.g., equity mandates).
Russia (1917)	Bourgeois/middle class (majority landowners) as "oppressors."	Rally the proletariat (minority workers) for revolution; purges killed millions.	Bolsheviks seized power; collectivism was installed.
China (1949)	Landlords/wealthy (majority rural owners) are seen as "class enemies."	Mobilize peasants (minority poor) via land reform; the Cultural Revolution targeted intellectuals.	Mao's CCP took control; collectivism via communes.
South Africa (Current)	White minority (8%) framed as "oppressors" by ANC/EFF (black majority leaders).	"White monopoly capital" rhetoric rallies the black majority for land expropriation.	ANC consolidates power; corruption/poverty persist.
India (Current Left Tactics)	The Hindu majority is framed as "fascists" by communists (e.g., in Kerala/West Bengal).	Rally minorities (Muslims/Dalits) against "Hindutva oppression."	Left parties gain in states; divide for electoral wins.

Common-Sense Filter: Marxism's playbook adapts to any majority—use "oppression" narratives to unite minorities, destabilize, seize power. Outcomes prove it works globally, exploiting differences as tools. Race/religion excuses vary, but the goal (control) stays the same. If race caused problems, they'd vanish under different leadership—but they don't, as Africa's data shows. Thus, ideology like collectivism is the consistent thread, making race a red herring. Blaming "white supremacy" ignores the ideological root, which targets power-holders everywhere. So we should all be asking ourselves the same question, should we not?

Why is it only evil when white people do it?

Something to think about, guys, until next time. ~Ghost

---