Geoengineering: A Double-Edged Dagger at Humanities Throat?
- Charles "Ghost" Coutts
- Jul 12
- 7 min read
Updated: Jul 13
It is far easier to fool someone that it is to convince them that they have been fooled. ~Samual Clemens
(Opinion)
Geoengineering has sparked significant debate and for a long time I was one of the deniers until I started looking into it myself and one lie led to another until I found the truth. Funny how that works is it not?
First, I would like to clarify something to minimize any misunderstandings. Climate change is real and only a fool thinks it isn't. "Man-Made" climate change is a load of manure. There is no climate crisis, the earth is doing exactly what it should be doing during the interglacial period of an ending ice age. Anyone telling you any different either does not know what they are talking about, or they are trying to mislead you towards their own agenda through fear of the great invisible enemy that is always threatening us but never actually materializes. Here, let me show you a prime example.
This is called fear mongering people, none of this ever happened but what did happen was billions of dollars were collected by the fear mongers that was then used to force legislation to legalize their grift and step up the fear mongering even more because they know it will bring them billions of more dollars from scared ignorant people willing to give up their rights to be saved from the big bad boogy man that doesn't exist, never did exist except in our own minds. So when I use the term climate change I mean natural climate change that is happening right now.
That clarification is crucial to my thoughts on geoengineering because the way I see it there is no need to be doing it. Sure, everything they say to scare people more than likely will happen, 10,000 or maybe a million years or so from now which I do not see as any kind of immediate threat myself, I won't even be dust anymore by time that happens so why do I need to suffer and sacrifice now for no reason whatsoever? That makes zero logical sense to me and that is what I base my understanding of the world around me on, logic, commonsense and critical thinking.
As always, my content is meant for educational and informational purposes only, these are my opinions and viewpoints based on my own research. Agreeing with me is not a requirement. It's just something to think about.
Geoengineering is made up of several parts so let's examine them one by one from a risk/benefit perspective. Pros v Cons if you prefer that term. Geoengineering involves intentional, large-scale efforts to alter the Earth's climate to counteract climate change and its impacts. It generally falls into two categories: Solar Radiation Management (SRM) and Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR).
Solar Radiation Management (SRM)
SRM focuses on reflecting a small amount of the sun's light and heat away from Earth, which could help decrease global warming. Notable SRM techniques include:
Stratospheric Aerosol Injection: This method injects reflective particles, like sulfur dioxide, high into the stratosphere, creating a barrier that reduces the amount of sunlight hitting the Earth. Research suggests that if implemented, this could temporarily lower global temperatures by about 1 degree Celsius.
Cloud Seeding: This technique enhances precipitation by releasing substances into the atmosphere, increasing the reflectivity of clouds. For instance, in places like China, cloud seeding has led to a reported increase in rainfall by up to 30% in targeted areas, although results can vary greatly.
Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) is another part of geoengineering, but it doesn't really apply to what is being sprayed in our skies which is my primary focus. I will provide a link to it at the bottom for those interested
The goal or intent behind geoengineering is clear: stabilize the climate, lower global temperatures, and minimize the impacts of climate change on human life and biodiversity.
I have to interject my viewpoint in here again. There is no climate crisis, the climate does not need stabalized so they are the ones destabalizing it theough this geoengineering. This IS the true "Man-Made' climate change guys. They turn our skies from a beautiful blue with white fluffy clouds and warm sunshine into silver haze that feels oppressive. Even the sun feels different after they spray that stuff in the sky to create those clouds. I want my blue skies back, how about you?
Potential Benefits of Geoengineering
Geoengineering could play a crucial role in mitigating global warming and its effects. Key benefits include:
Rapid Climate Change Mitigation: Techniques like SRM could provide immediate cooling effects, helping to combat extreme temperature spikes.
Increased Agricultural Productivity: Improved precipitation patterns and temperature moderation can create more optimal conditions for crop growth, potentially increasing yields by as much as 20% in regions currently facing drought.
Economic Stability: By cushioning economies from climate-related disasters, geoengineering could help avoid losses projected to reach over $200 billion annually in various sectors, including agriculture, insurance, and health.
While these benefits appear promising, delving into potential risks presents a more complex landscape. What sounds good on paper very rarely works as well as expected in practice because there are always unaccounted for variables that were either overlooked or ignored in order to push these projects into full operation as quickly as possible so that the idea becomes a profitable business and starts filling bank accounts. It is always about the money, human life is a secondary consideration, or they would not be doing it without long-term studies which they are performing right now, on us. We are the long-term study participants whether we want to be or not. They will study the effects of all of this by studying us and our corpses later. That is how science works and if there is no control group, which there isn't, they get exactly the results that they need to sweep it all under the rug. Welcome to reality. You may be figuring out that this geoengineering is seriously pissing me off so I apologize for the event I may lose my temper.
Geoengineering also carries uncertainties and when I say that I mean the people doing it don't know shit, particularly regarding unintended consequences for animal life, including humans, insects, and ecosystems. The introduction of harmful chemicals into the atmosphere via geoengineering projects raises significant health and environmental concerns. Have you experienced or feel an increase in severity of these symptoms?
Human Health Risks: Chemicals, such as sulfur compounds, released through geoengineering can lead to various health issues. Immediate exposure might result in:
Acute Symptoms: These include coughing, chest tightness, throat irritation, and eye irritation. A study from the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine noted a direct correlation between sulfur compound levels and increased respiratory emergency visits.
Chronic Conditions: Prolonged exposure may contribute to serious health problems like chronic respiratory diseases and an increased risk of heart disease.
And many more far worse impacts as well.
Impact on Insects and Wildlife: Insects, crucial for pollination, can experience detrimental effects from geoengineering methods. Altered weather patterns and exposure to harmful chemicals may disrupt their life cycles, food availability, and habitats, leading to dramatic declines in populations. For example, studies have documented that certain insect populations have decreased by over 50% in areas affected by climate changes linked to geoengineering.
Let's look at those Interactions between various geoengineering chemicals in the air that can and do lead to unforeseen challenges. For example, the combination of sulfur dioxide and other particles might result in:
Formation of Acid Rain: This can critically damage freshwater sources, harming aquatic ecosystems and species that rely on these habitats. Acid rain has been shown to increase aluminum levels in water, making it toxic to fish.
Small tid bit to think about. This stuff can turn rain (water) into acid, right? Well, we humans are commonly considered to be about 70% water so what the hell is this stuff doing to us on the inside?
Toxicity in Soil: Chemical build-up can degrade soil quality, affect plants and disrupt food webs. A decline in soil health can result in lower agricultural productivity, further exacerbating food security issues.
Research indicates that when chemicals interact, they may produce new compounds that have unknown effects on both health and ecosystems, increasing potential risks.
Which view do you prefer?
The following is an excerpt from the documentary The Dimming. I highly recommend watching the whole thing, you can find it here. https://youtu.be/rf78rEAJvhY
So, let's consider some possible or should I say likely longterm impacts if we allow this geoengineering to continue.
Ecosystem Imbalance: Ongoing geoengineering can and most likely will disrupt species balance, leading to extinction or the rise of invasive species, negatively affecting local biodiversity.
Feedback Loops: Some geoengineering approaches could inadvertently trigger climate feedback loops. For instance, increased rainfall in some regions could lead to droughts in others, creating a cycle of unpredictable weather extremes. Sound Familiar?
Exacerbating Social Inequities: The benefits and risks related to geoengineering will not be shared equally. Vulnerable populations will of course face heightened impacts from poorly managed geoengineering efforts, as always, the people the progressives/Marxists claim to be helping are inevitably the worst harmed by those very efforts.
The goal or intent of geoengineering may be well-intentioned, and it may have other agendas behind it. More than likely both of these things are true at the same time. To mitigate climate change and foster a stable climate for generations to come is the claim they justify the actions with. However, I see the outcomes as far too great of a risk to human life and our planets stability to be even thinking about, much less actually doing it. Especially as I have stated multiple times there is no threat immediate enough to humanity to justify these actions at this time, there is no climate crisis except the one geoengineering is creating while blaming fossil fuels for the results we can all see around us. "Don't pay attention to that, look over here" classic misdirection.
The most significant risks may not just stem from the chemicals used or the adverse health effects, but we must also consider the unpredictable nature of manipulating complex natural systems, essentially playing God. Human intervention could and probably will amplify many existing environmental issues and create unforeseen ecological consequences, potentially harming or even killing the very populations geoengineering claims they seek to protect. Are you detecting a theme here?
In closing I will admit that I am new to researching this subject, I am still finding the truth within the lies so don't be surprised if my viewpoints fluctuate some or change altogether depending on what further research digs up.
As for now, something to think about, until next time. ~Ghost
Authors Note: If you would like to know more about the chemicals in use and other relevant information visit our Facebook group "Clear Skies Wisconsin" Even if you live in another state, you will find the information useful. Our hope is that others will follow us and several other states in creating grassroots movements in their own communities around the United States and hopefully a global ban is in the future.
Comments